Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sun City
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3
    Thanked: 0

    Default Which 4x4 Triton - 3.2 or 2.5?

    I have decided to buy the Triton.

    Now to decide between the 3.2 4x4 or the 2.5 4x4 version. I have spoken to salesmen saying they dont make the 2.5 4x4 anymore although you might find a low km 2008 registered as a 2009. Apparently stopped making the 2.5 4x4 version in 2008?

    Looking at the specs of the 2 versions, the 3.2, 118 kw and 343 NM torque VS the 2.5 100 kw and 314 NM torque, there is not such a big difference? And the rest of the vehicle is exactly the same, interior an exterior?

    I want to use it for trips up north, Namibia and Mosambique. Not really into hardcore catogory 5 obstacles and soforth. Mostly a reliable 4x4 that you can go to Bots, Namibia and Mosambique. So it must be able to handle sand an water with ease.

    Can the members with hands on knowledge of the 2 version please post their recommendations and views here?

    Thank you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Barberton
    Age
    67
    Posts
    7,345
    Thanked: 8730

    Default

    CjvR,

    The 3.2 has been around for a decade and is slowly achieving legend status.

    BUT, to the best of my knowledge is the Pajero Super Select 4x4 system in the 2.5 and not in the 3.2. That has been debated before and if my memory serves me correctly, is a function of import specs from Australia, or something like that. To my own mind, your choice is a bit of a Mexican stand-off.

    Drive both and decide!

    Good luck,
    Roelf

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Somewhere
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanked: 138

    Default

    For about R8000 more you can get the 3.5 V6.There are specials running on them for R305 000.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fanad,Co Donegal, Ireland
    Age
    47
    Posts
    105
    Thanked: 0

    Default The 2.5 does it 4 me

    I might, as a very Proud South African live in Ireland but still closely observe whats happening in the SA car market end very much so with the 4x4/bakkie, simply coz I still drive use my bakkie/4x4 like a South African
    I went to a Mitsubishi dealer in Cape Town with my brother in Law to drive 3.5 triton. The first thing I noticed on 3.2 & 3.5 was the easy select 4wd instead of super select 4wd, I have an Pajero Pinnin /IO and that has ss4wd so why not the 3.2, 3.5 but the 2.5 a bit silly for me. Dont no if 3.2 & 3.5 have the traction control and the very back electric window, all this is very helpfull on my 2.5.
    Now performance, dont let anybody tell U its underpowered, had 285/55/R18 wheels on for 55k/km and still got 15sec to a 100km/h and 175km/h (spedo reading) and most importantly the 9-10l/100km is no bother/problem
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	28-12-08 667.jpg 
Views:	894 
Size:	62.0 KB 
ID:	49889   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bakkie 1 221.jpg 
Views:	607 
Size:	69.0 KB 
ID:	49890   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bakkie 1 297.jpg 
Views:	521 
Size:	121.0 KB 
ID:	49891   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bakkie 1 216.jpg 
Views:	531 
Size:	86.7 KB 
ID:	49892  

    Paddyjack

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sun City
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Thank you to who replied. It is a complicated issue as it will be my first 4x4 and want to make the right choice.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pereybere
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,269
    Thanked: 43

    Default

    Yes 2.5 does not make much less than the 3.2, but its all about how the power is delivered
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5.jpg 
Views:	1396 
Size:	17.5 KB 
ID:	49912   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3.2.png 
Views:	1289 
Size:	19.4 KB 
ID:	49913  
    Last edited by JGoosen; 2010/01/16 at 10:47 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Barberton
    Age
    67
    Posts
    7,345
    Thanked: 8730

    Default

    JGoosen,
    I used your graphs to support your statement: "but its all about how the power is delivered".

    They are close only at 2000rpm, then the 2.5 has 91%Nm and 94%Kw of the 3.2.
    Very significant is when the revs drop to 1500, then the 2.5 is at 86%Nm and 80%kw.
    At 3000rpm the 2.5 is at 80%Nm and 82%Kw.

    This suggests that at normal cruising, the 2.5 will be close to the 3.2, but with considerable less "grunt" at 1500 and at higher revs considerable less "overtaking-type" power, either by dropping a gear or picking up speed in top.

    My "Mexican standoff" statement still stands. The one has the engine of choice (power delivery as well as legendary reliability) and the other one has the 4x4 system of choice.

    Any prospective buyer that faces this decision, should decide where his personal preference is, engine power or better 4x4 system - and I still maintain: drive both and decide!

    Roelf

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Weltevredenpark
    Age
    56
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I bought the 2.5 last year April and am very very happy with it, I have done Berakha and a few other trails and have not had any issues with power delivery at all, the reason I went for the 2.5 is the 4x4 specs that are different to the 3.2. This in my opinion is a go anywhere 4x4 vehicle.
    2009 Triton DI-D 4x4
    No Mods (yet)

    Some people are only alive because it is illegal to shoot them!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Weltevredenpark
    Age
    56
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I might be wrong here but does the 3.2 also have the central diff lock, I seem to remember that the one I test drove did not, but as I say I might be wrong check it out. I know the 2.5 has central diff lock and seperate rear diff lock opperated.
    2009 Triton DI-D 4x4
    No Mods (yet)

    Some people are only alive because it is illegal to shoot them!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cape Town
    Age
    56
    Posts
    949
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    3.2 over the 2.5 the increase in power is noticable. If you are not worried about consumpion and then the petrol.
    However I would only keep the 3,2 as a main vehicle if in warrentee

    2007 Mitsubishi 'Mighty' Triton
    2006 Jeep Wrangler
    2009 Jeep Wrangler

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    durbanville
    Age
    45
    Posts
    836
    Thanked: 11

    Default

    I have the 2.5 4 x 4, i just love it, it goes anywhere where all my friends with their petrol cars and some bigger diesels go. And consumption is great.
    2020 V6 Amarok Highline 4M
    2017 Fortuner 2.8 GD 6 4x4 auto ( sold)
    2014 Amarok Bitdi Auto 132kw db cab 4M ( sold)
    2010 Fortuner V6 4x4 (sold)
    2007 2.5 DID Triton 4x4 (sold)

    Playdate
    Jeep Wrangler JK 2dr
    Cooper STT Pro 33's
    Maniac Bumper
    Poisen spider rock slider
    1 No Petrol card

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sun City
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Thank you once again to those who has replied. The complication and confusion of the choice is growing.

    I will keep on researching and following the threads on this forum, must say I have learned alot already. Thank you!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northcliff
    Age
    53
    Posts
    19
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Hi

    I am also the proud owner of a Triton 2.5 super select 4x4. Recently changed the rubber to 265/75/16". Not al lot of places it will not go. I love it

    Riaan

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kathu
    Age
    45
    Posts
    224
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    Hi CjvR,

    Look at my thread there was a long discussion of the 2.5 vs. 3.2

    I have the 2.5 with 265/75/R16 and miss the power below 2000rpm, would have liked to have the power of the 3.2.
    Andre Nortje
    Kathu - NC

    2008 Mitsubishi Triton 2.5 Di-D 4x4

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Edenvale
    Age
    51
    Posts
    45
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I too have the 2.5, and extremely happy with it. Yes, its not as torquey is the 3.2 low down, but runs like a bomb on the open road, has got plently enough grunt in low range to combat most obstacles (unless you are into extreme 4x4 stuff) and I get really good consumption out of it. Mine is the import version so have all the luxuries of the 3.2 and more, so all in all I am very chuffed..

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 2013/07/16, 02:37 PM
  2. Tyre choice for Triton 4x2 (2.5 DiD)
    By mladen001 in forum Tyre chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2009/11/14, 08:41 PM
  3. Another bash at The Rocky Mounatin 4x4 Trail
    By Big Hilux in forum Eastern Cape
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2007/02/20, 01:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •