Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Results 161 to 163 of 163
  1. #161
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vanderbijlpark
    Age
    56
    Posts
    4,834
    Thanked: 1180

    Default Re: Ford LION V6 disappoints...again (not the crank this time)

    Quote Originally Posted by QuQ View Post
    Where did you get these numbers from?
    Also want to know.

    I thought it was around 190kw and 600nm.
    2022 Amarok V6

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    WC
    Posts
    1,672
    Thanked: 529

    Default Re: Ford LION V6 disappoints...again (not the crank this time)

    Quote Originally Posted by clubbie View Post
    Also want to know.

    I thought it was around 190kw and 600nm.
    My recollection (google can confirm) was 180kw/600nm which then became 183kw/600nm with the SDV6.

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Bloemfontein
    Posts
    387
    Thanked: 328

    Default Re: Ford LION V6 disappoints...again (not the crank this time)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ianvr View Post
    Perhaps because the Ranger/Amarok engine is detuned, the engine will last longer or reduce the amount or torque on the crank.

    Discovery: 257KW and 700NM

    Ford: 184KW and 600NM

    According to the one German mechanic on YouTube itís not only how you drive and service the vehicle, itís how well (or bad) the crank was heat treated during manufacture that also contributes to crank failures.
    You do realise the D350 Range Rover uses a i6 3L Land Rover engine? It is nothing like the 306DT LION 3L V6 engine. The Lion Max output was 188KW and 600 NM
    Last edited by _FC; Yesterday at 03:52 PM.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •