Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    23
    Thanked: 4

    Default Hindrances Because of Defender's Switch to Unibody?

    I've been seriously thinking about a Defender, the 90, because of its excellent approach, breakover, and departure angles. However, has anyone experienced any issues specifically related to the Defender being unibody rather than body on frame?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Stellenbosch
    Posts
    3,391
    Thanked: 3166

    Default Re: Hindrances Because of Defender's Switch to Unibody?

    One caveat with JLR's switch to aluminium unibody: even minor damages from a collision can result in the vehicle being written off by insurance due to the exorbitant cost of repairs, not to mention that it requires special tools/skills that are not common.
    2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
    2015 Range Rover Sport Supercharged V8 HSE Dynamic



    Defender Puma Workshop Manual:https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
    Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
    Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pretoria
    Age
    52
    Posts
    739
    Thanked: 330

    Default Re: Hindrances Because of Defender's Switch to Unibody?

    I can only say that my 110 is awesome.

    Spent a bit if time in the "old" V8 D4 week or so back.

    I love my D4 it has 270,000 km on and still drives like new - but man the new 110 spoilt me

    The 90 is for me the best looking thing on the road..

    On the written off after accident issue:

    This is really on all vehicles:

    I bought a new Kia Sedona in April 2016 for R568 995
    Only used it for holidays and when everybody in the family needed a seat in the car thus was on 76,000 km

    Family member had an accident 3 weeks ago - damage looked bad but not extreme - Airbags deployed ...
    Un-Economical to repair - written off - value around R380,000

    Get a 90 ND

    Cheers

    Nico
    Nico van Diemen

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to NvD42 For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    B-gowrie Randburg
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,278
    Thanked: 868

    Default Re: Hindrances Because of Defender's Switch to Unibody?

    … not sure I recall such/many comparative disadvantages experienced over the years
    with THE vdub beetles … in fact the flat belly topography, especially with larger tyres, even 16s, resulted in good clearance … and did accidents lead to greater body damage, more write-offs or excessive insurance etc ?
    I tended to see their ‘tortoise-shell’ type unibody, without any conventional chassis, having more 3-D structural strength, probably conferring many benefits. IMO.

    Technology had also progressed considerably since the age of the Beetle
    eg seamless Monocoque body framework manufacture
    and
    Plastic foam injection into hollow tube sections such as door pillars etc which , once set, confers far greater strength in bodywork units whilst adding little weight. (… not sure of the technical terminology for this material/process. )
    Last edited by BushNomad; 2023/08/30 at 02:01 PM.
    ... Land Rover Owners dont idle long ...

    2002 Defender 130 DC HCPU. :
    Own the road... Any road ...
    ‘1981 R-Rvr Classic 2-Dr 3.5L V8 :
    The Greatest Rover.
    ‘1975 Series3 88 PUP :
    Simply ... Classic ...
    ‘2017 Metalian Mini ...
    A Home from Home

    * The Monarch of the Glen *http://www.4x4community.co.za/forum/...1&d=1507751251

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •