Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 68

Thread: AT Tyre Tests

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Durbanville ,Cape town
    Age
    67
    Posts
    497
    Thanked: 1

    Default AT Tyre Tests

    Lots of info on most Tyre makes in the ALL TERAIN Area, This makes interesting reading . Sorry pics don,t come out
    I will later try to paste the comparison, ek is maar dom met die goed

    Gripping Stuff
    Words by Glenn Wright, photography by Robb Cox and studio photography by Karl Dietrich
    Glenn Wright mixes hi-tech gadgetry with years of motorsport testing experience to bring you the latest no-bull 4WD Action tyre comparo. Over four gruelling days, all 14 major players in the A/T market went tread to tread on every surface down-under. Are they really the jack-of-all-trades, or can A/Ts be the master of some? Don’t even try to anticipate the results
    WHO MADE IT HAPPEN?
    These results don’t appear by magic. Over the three months it took to organise this test, I spent many hours on the end of the phone explaining that I wanted to do a tyre test in more detail than any ever attempted in the 4WD industry. Some people said it couldn’t be done, but those whose names appear in this story jumped at the chance to be involved.
    When I needed wheels, the first name that came to mind was ROH. Testing the tyres on each road surface one after another was important. With 56 tyres to be tested, 56 wheels were needed to mount them all to before we left Sydney.
    ROH Wheels supplied us with pallet loads of its latest RTX alloys that transformed the mild-looking HiLux into a real head-turner.
    Without the hassle of mounting and demounting tyres during the test, I could get through all the bitumen testing, for example, in one day.
    This was necessary to ensure the road conditions were the same for every tyre and, more importantly, kept my impression of the preceding tyres fresh in my mind so as to make accurate comparisons between their performances.
    Thanks to Sam at Overkill Engineering for his handy air jack and to Kangaroo Creek Imports for supplying these handy rattle guns. They do a great job in getting wheels off quickly and are easy to carry on long trips.
    What can I say about the HiLux that the pictures don’t? It stood up to a week of punishment, including merciless braking tests and countless dousing in mud. The Toyota handled the high-speed gravel testing with ease, and its predictable handling and sharp steering allowed me to tell how each tyre went in those sections.
    The 4L petrol goes like a scalded cat, and it is the first 4WD I have ever emerged from after a week of driving without a hint of back pain. In hindsight, I couldn’t have chosen a more appropriate vehicle to test all 14 sets of tyres on.
    We had the perfect place to test the tyres, the vehicle to test them on and wheels to mount them to. I now needed someone to fit and balance all 56 tyres and get them up to the test ground.
    Enter Beaurepaires. From the senior management down, Beaurepaires staff share our love of off-roading.

    Beaurepaires was my first choice because of its huge network of country branches and bush support. It knows what we 4WDers put our tyres through and can offer an additional four-year Road Hazard Warranty. This covers you for all unrepairable tyre damage for four years.
    It was keen to be heavily involved in the logistical side and supplied three experienced tyre fitters to whip tyres on and off the HiLux all week. (I said it was ‘kind’ of a holiday, didn’t I, guys?)
    Surrounded by such professionals, I could just concentrate on evaluating the tyres, which allowed me to complete the test without knowing which tyres were on the HiLux until the very end.

    This approach eliminated any of my preconceptions regarding the brands, and after the test my notes were married up with a list of the tyres in the order in which they were tested.
    TERMINOLOGY
    A/T: Stands for all-terrain and refers to a 4WD tyre that can be used on most surfaces.
    M/T: Stands for mud-terrain tyre or ‘muddie’ for use in muddy conditions.
    H/T: Denotes a highway-terrain tyre designed for on-road use.

    TYRE PATTERN: Refers to the tread pattern and is unique to each variant within a certain brand of tyre (For example, Scorpion, Dueler 694 and so on).
    SPEED RATING: In this test, the speed ratings range from N to T. This specifies the maximum speed that you can travel at with this tyre inflated to its maximum labelled pressure. N=140km/h, P=150km/h, Q=160km/h, R=170km/h, S=180km/h, T=180km/h.
    LOAD RATING/INDEX: The load index represents a figure in kilograms being the maximum weight that tyre can carry at its maximum recommended inflation pressure.




    LET THE TESTING BEGIN
    Do you salivate over sand driving? Drooling over dirt? Maybe mud’s on your menu?
    Whatever your taste in terrain, here’s the recipe for the ultimate A/T tyre test I prepared earlier.

    Preparation time: we allowed three months to source all ingredients.
    Grab four of the latest A/T tyres from each of the 14 biggest tyre companies on the planet. Wrap them around 56 new ROH alloy wheels. Stick them under a new HiLux Ute and throw in equal parts sand, asphalt, gravel and wet clay.
    Shred tyres across every road surface, turning often, until the tread becomes hot and sticky. Pierce each tyre under controlled conditions with a steel plunger to measure its puncture resistance, and record the noise it makes when rotated on the bitumen at 80km/h.
    Hand-pick the finest team of tyre fitters from Beaurepaires and throw them into the mix along with all the gear you’d need to set up a tyre shop in the middle of nowhere.

    Whet a final-year mechanical engineering student’s appetite with all the latest data-logging equipment he can sink his teeth into, and you’ve literally got yourself the most in-depth A/T tyre comparo ever attempted in 4WDing history.
    I invite you to gorge yourself on the smorgasbord of information that follows. After digesting the results, you’ll be hungry to get out there and purchase the A/T tyre that’s best for you.
    We 4WDers are a hard bunch to please when it comes to tyres. We want a 4WD tyre that is well behaved on the black stuff, right at home on the sand and is happier than a pig in the slop. (Unlike muddies or highway tyres, an A/T tyre doesn’t have the luxury of specialising on any one surface.) Oh, and can they do it quietly, not get punctures and last forever?
    Okay, we might be asking a bit much, but huge demand for the versatile A/T has seen every major rubber company invest heaps of time and money to come up with a compromise between the M/T and the H/T. Let me explain.

    A/T TYRE CONSTRUCTION

    Don’t assume too much from looking at the tread. The secret to an A/T’s performance lies deep beneath its tread pattern.
    The unique tread designs play a big role in each tyre’s performance, and the more open patterns usually fare better in the mud and worse on the bitumen, but a quick look at how tyres are made sheds more light on what’s really going on.
    Every tyre on the test started life as white rubber sap that was collected from rubber trees or was partly synthetically produced.

    Each manufacturer has a different way of transforming that raw product into a tyre it hopes will outperform its competitors in as many conditions as possible. Due to the multitude of ways engineers can achieve this, every brand of A/T tyre varies significantly in its construction.
    Each tyre’s overall construction uses a different combination of steel, nylon and or polyester belts encased in rubber of varying compounds. This construction is critical in providing strength and allowing the tread to get maximum purchase on the ground.

    We’ve all seen how useless an H/T is in mud and vice versa, so you can appreciate how hard it is to reach a compromise in construction that allows an A/T to cope with so many different surfaces. As a result, some tyre manufacturers sacrifice one aspect of off-road performance in return for better performance in another.
    TEST METHOD
    What made you choose your current A/Ts? Brand loyalty from the past, have you been seduced by convincing ad campaigns or did some bloke at the bar give you the good oil on what tyre to settle on?
    Plenty of us have been fortunate enough to try out many different brands over the years, but it’s difficult to draw a comparison between them unless you’re using the same vehicle on the same roads, testing the tyres in quick succession.

    Hopefully the 12 years I spent engineering race cars and waving spanners for Ralliart while Tommi Makinen won his four World Rally Championships have counted for something. The test procedures followed here are a combination of those used by tyre manufacturers testing their own products and those used in top-level motorsport to determine the most competitive tyre to use.
    Subjective testing is necessary to be able to put into words how each tyre felt through the seat of my pants and the steering wheel. But nothing beats the numerical feedback recorded by the data logger.
    The HiLux resembled a coma patient with all the data loggers and cables hanging out of it, but the data we gathered from them validated the results and confirmed my opinions on each tyre.

    Having said that, a bunch of numbers means nothing unless you know how to interpret them. Drew is graduating from Sydney Uni as we speak and has been rallying with me for years. He is familiar with vehicle testing and took charge of our hi-tech accessories while ensuring all testing was consistent.
    We chose the most commonly sold A/T tyre size in Australia, the 265/75R16. In order to compare apples with apples, all 265/75R16s (except the Silverstone, which only offers a 275/70R16 LT) were happily supplied by the manufacturers in light-truck (LT) construction (as opposed to passenger-vehicle construction, which is not as strong).

    Several manufacturers had more than one type of A/T tyre, so I requested they send the most suitable latest release.
    With all the tyres on our doorstep and everything taking shape, I needed to find the perfect venue. The testing grounds had to reflect every possible condition that A/Ts would be subjected to in real life.
    After much searching, we found a private property that had the lot - bitumen roads, gravel roads, both well formed and un-kept, and a wide, open gravel area that we graded constantly to maintain a level playing field.

    All these areas were a stone’s throw from a flooded clay boghole, which led up to a 30 degree inclined gravel hill designed to stop 4WDs from making it to the top.
    In testing these tyres, I wanted to provide answers to all the questions buyers ask about all-terrains. These include noise, performance in sand, mud, gravel, bitumen and puncture resistance.
    TYRE NOISE
    Generally, A/Ts are quieter on-road than muddies, but it’s too late once you’ve forked out for a set of A/Ts only to realise that the tyre noise drives you nuts. To bring out the worst in each tyre, a section of coarse bitumen was chosen on which to perform a coast-down noise test.
    ‘Pattern’ noise caused by the tread is most noticeable at higher speeds, so at 80km/h I depressed the clutch to eliminate driveline and engine noise. We used a sound meter to record what you would hear from inside the vehicle over a 10sec period.
    To give some relevance to the results, the standard OE tyres on the HiLux recorded 59.1dB under the same conditions. For every 3dB increase, you approximately double the noise volume.


    MANUFACTURER: MICKEY THOMPSON
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: FC2
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: N
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $275

    COMMENT
    MICKEY THOMPSON FC2
    The FC2 turned in well on the gravel. It responded pretty well to steering changes and was predictable. 7/10

    On the bitumen slalom, things changed; the steering was unresponsive and vague. The chunky tread blocks that excelled in the mud squirmed around under the load. Not the worst tyre on the blacktop but not the pick either. 6/10
    The FC2 was like a pig, in that it loved the mud. This was the second-best tyre in the sloppy clay and responded to the throttle, making light work of the slippery conditions. 9.5/10
    The chunky blocks in the tread bit into the gravel incline and walked up it with ease. 8.5/10
    On sand, the FC2s found it hard to get going from rest. Once moving, they had good bite and gained momentum quickly. 6.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed no signs of chipping and only minor cutting.



    MANUFACTURER: MICHELIN
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: LTX A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: C 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $332

    COMMENT
    The Michelin carried higher speeds than most through the bitumen slalom and remained composed. It offered great response to turn-in and gave a great feel for what was happening. 9.5/10

    On the gravel, the Michelin had plenty of grip, even giving off a loud whining noise as it bit into the gravel circle. It was hard to make them wheelspin, and they carried higher speeds around the circle than any other tyre.
    As far as balance was concerned, they understeered on turn-in but were very difficult to make oversteer. Their best feature was sideways grip on gravel, and no other tyre could repeat their performance. 10/10

    They handled the clay pit well, biting in and responding to the accelerator. 8/10
    The gravel incline saw the clogged-up Michelins struggle for grip, not making much of an impression on the hill. 6
    Really good bulge in the sidewalls at 20psi allowed them to sit on top of the sand. They lacked a little bite to gain momentum quickly. 9/10



    MANUFACTURER: YOKOHAMA MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: GEOLANDER G011
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $239

    COMMENT
    While the G011s’ response to turn-in wasn’t as sharp as I had expected, on the bitumen slalom they were predictable, letting you know their intentions. They were slow to react to a change in direction, as the tread blocks rolled under the tyre during hard cornering. 7.5/10

    They lacked grip on the gravel section relative to the better gravel tyres, and they understeered readily. 6.5/10
    I was pleasantly surprised by their traction in the clay pit. They dug in and pulled the HiLux through easily. They were only a whisker less capable than the Cooper and BFG, and were one of the best options for a good mud tyre that’s quiet on-road. 8.5/10
    On the gravel hill, the Yokies spun too easily and gave up the fight. 6.5/10
    The Geolanders were just reasonable on sand. They didn’t float as well as some others and made it hard to get going from a standing start. Reasonable bite allowed them to gain momentum up the dune. 6/10
    They showed very minor signs of tread chipping after the test.


    MANUFACTURER: SILVERSTONE
    MADE IN MALAYSIA
    PATTERN NAME: AT-117-SPECIAL
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 225mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: 114
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $198 inc fitting

    COMMENT
    This tyre was not a good performer on the slalom. It was vague and unresponsive on turn-in and didn’t change direction well. 6.5/10

    The Silverstone had good general grip in the gravel and was reluctant to hang the tail out because it was very prone to understeering. 7/10
    The Silverstone, which shares a similar tread pattern to the BFG, was good in the clay. 8/10
    The Silverstone climbed a long way up the hill but had its fair share of wheelspin in getting up. 8/10
    For a tyre that resembles the BFG in many ways, the Silverstone was nowhere near as good on sand. It lacked flotation and bite. 6.5/10
    No cutting or chipping was noticed on the tread. They are a bit average on bitumen but will keep you moving forwards on the slippery stuff.


    MANUFACTURER: BRIDGESTONE
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: DUELER D694
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $267

    COMMENT
    This tyre performed well on tarmac. It was a little slow to respond to steering, but once the tread blocks had rolled under the tyre a little, it grips and changes direction well. It carried a higher speed through the slalom than many and was predictable. They just lacked the direct steering response of the top three. 8.5/10

    The Bridgestone fought well for grip on the gravel. The HiLux was better balanced on the Duelers than most and gave the best feedback as to when you had overstepped the mark. They had plenty of grip in a straight line and were one of the best for stopping on gravel. They provided good response to steering but just didn’t have the outright grip of the leaders. 8.5/10
    The Dueler put up a good fight in the clay pit. 7.5/10
    They were okay on the hill but had to work pretty hard to get up with lots of wheelspin. 7/10
    The 694 bellied out well and showed great flotation on sand. They displayed very impressive bite, and response to throttle saw them climb the dune easily. 9.5/10
    No cutting or chipping was noticed on the tread.


    MANUFACTURER: SUMITOMO
    PATTERN NAME: SL850 SERENGETI RADIAL A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    MADE IN JAPAN
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $225

    COMMENT
    We had slight difficulty in mounting some of the Sumitomo A/Ts on the wheels due to what appeared to be extra-tight clearances in the bead diameters. While they weren’t as sharp in the steering department as the top few on-road, they weren’t too bad. 7/10

    In the sloppy clay, the Sumitomos bit in well with no hint of getting bogged. 7.5/10
    Lateral grip exceeded my expectations on gravel, allowing a bit of understeer, while the rear end never stepped out. 8/10
    The gravel hill didn’t suit the Serengetis, which struggled for grip almost from the word go. 6/10
    The Serengetis aren’t a good sand tyre. I needed low-range to get moving. Poor flotation made them struggle, and I had to keep the revs and momentum up to keep moving. 4/10
    Very minor cutting was noticed in the tread after testing.


    MANUFACTURER: COOPER
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: DISCOVERER ST-C
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 220mm
    SPEED RATING: N
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $308

    COMMENT
    The Coopers were the most off-road-oriented tyres in the field. As a result, they aren’t well suited to the blacktop. On the bitumen slalom, the chunky tread blocks squirmed around, making the steering feel vague. The Coopers slid at all four corners of the HiLux as I tried to maintain a similar speed through the slalom to the better bitumen brands. 6/10

    On the gravel circle, the Coopers broke into understeer. They offered good fore/aft traction on gravel roads, were good for braking and were quite predictable, recovering well from high-speed slides. They had a tendency to tramline on long, straight stretches. On hard-packed gravel, the Cooper’s aggressive tread feels harder than the others and doesn’t get the chance to bite in. It therefore doesn’t grip as well on this surface as some of the less aggressive softer-compound tyres but performs well considering. 7.5/10
    The Coopers were the best tyres in the sloppy clay. Their ability to bite in and grab handfuls of the stuff as they churned their way across was second to none, even though the Mickey Thompsons weren’t far behind. 10/10
    The steep gravel hill also suited the Coopers. Once again they outperformed the rest of the field here as they bit into the slightly chopped-up gravel and climbed to the top. Even after momentary losses of grip, the Coopers were quick to regain traction and keep climbing. 10/10
    The ST-Cs’ sidewalls bellied out well at 20psi and provided good flotation on the sand. Good bite helped them gain momentum quickly. 8/10
    The ST-Cs are the new cut and chip-resistant compound, but the tread still showed signs of cutting and chipping after four days of abuse.


    MANUFACTURER: BF GOODRICH
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: ALL-TERRAIN T/A KO
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 220mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 120
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 3 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 3 polyester
    PRICE: $269

    COMMENT
    There was too much tread movement when cornering hard on the bitumen slalom. This resulted in slow and vague steering response. The lack of general lateral grip saw the rear tyres slide sideways, leaving impressive :blackies’ on the road that resembled those on a :slippery when wet’ sign. 6.5/10

    In a similar way on gravel, the BFGs showed good bite but switched between understeer and letting go at the rear at moderate speeds. Like the Coopers, the BFGs tramlined on the same long gravel straight. Overall good general gravel bite. 7.5/10
    The BFGs seemed at home in the clay pit. They were only a whisker less impressive than the Coopers and responded instantly to more throttle by ploughing through the slippery quagmire. 9/10
    On the climb up the gravel incline, the BFGs bit in and travelled a good distance up, but then they just stopped biting and spun. 8.5/10
    At 20psi, the sidewalls bulged out well. They had a good combination of flotation and bite on the sand. They steered out of existing ruts well and responded to acceleration. 8.5/10
    The tread showed signs of cutting after the test.



    MANUFACTURER: SIMEX
    MADE IN MALAYSIA
    PATTERN NAME: CENTIPEDE AT300i
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 205mm
    SPEED RATING: T
    LOAD RATING: 116
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $195

    COMMENT
    The Centipede AT300is were good on the gravel. They provided good front-end grip for steering and let out a howl when spinning as they fought and gripped on the dirt. They lacked a little braking and straight-line traction but showed good sideways grip on the gravel circle. 8.5/10

    On bitumen, they showed a good response to steering and changed direction well. 7/10
    The Simexes did a good job in the clay boghole, showing good bite. 7.5/10
    When their turn came to scale the gravel hill, they gave surprisingly good traction. 8 The sidewalls seemed to belly out well, but the Simex lacked flotation and bite on sand. 5.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed very minor signs of cutting.
    MANUFACTURER: TOYO
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: OPEN COUNTRY A/T (OPAT)
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $285

    COMMENT
    The OPATs provided good grip on bitumen. They responded quickly to changes in direction and went where I pointed them. 7.5/10

    On gravel, they lacked straight-line traction but gave good sideways grip. 6.5/10
    Their performance in clay was respectable. 6.5/10
    When climbing the steep hill, the Toyos were unspectacular but got on with the job. 7/10
    At 20psi, they showed very little sidewall bulge. They sat low in the sand and lacked grip, causing them to wheelspin easily and dig in. 5/10
    After testing, the tread showed no signs of cutting or chipping.


    MANUFACTURER: KUMHO
    MADE IN KOREA
    PATTERN NAME: ROAD VENTURE KL 41 (8-ply rating)
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $270

    Comments
    The Kumho’s soft tread blocks squirmed around on the bitumen and left some decent skid-marks to show the way through the slalom. Despite this, they turned in and gripped well. 7/10
    On gravel roads, the Kumhos bit into the surface, and the HiLux went where you pointed it. It showed no signs of tramlining. 8/10
    The Venture was very capable in the clay, where it hardly struggled for traction. 8/10
    Good bite on the steep gravel hill and their never-say-die attitude saw them slip then regain traction and climb some more. 8/10
    The Kumhos were the last to get a run on the sand. Their superior flotation and excellent traction shocked me. They didn’t quite have the bite of the Coopers, but they were by far the best overall. They climbed the dune easily with no run-up and were the only tyres to exit the beach in second-gear high-range. 10/10



    MANUFACTURER: DUNLOP
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: GRANDTREK AT2
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: C 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $284

    Comments
    The Dunlop was very predictable and put in a good fight on the gravel surface. It made a high-pitched hum as it gripped the constant-radius turn and showed early signs of wear on the outer shoulder. 8.5/10

    As soon as you turned the steering wheel on bitumen, the Dunlops responded. They carried good speed through the slalom and felt very stable. 9/10
    Wet clay didn’t suit the Dunlops much. 5.5/10
    They climbed the steep hill well but couldn’t do quite as well as the Kumhos. 7/10

    The Dunlops floated over the sand beautifully. Slightly less bite than the top few but still good overall. 9.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed no signs of cutting or chipping damage.


    MANUFACTURER: GOODYEAR
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: WRANGLER
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 aramid (Kevlar), 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE:

    COMMENT
    If four-wheel slides are your thing, then the Goodyears will suit your needs on the blacktop. They cried out for grip but couldn’t find any. At least they lost traction gradually and didn’t try to surprise with a sudden loss of control. 5.5/10

    The Goodyears weren’t all bad on the gravel. While they offered no grip to steer into corners, were slow to recover from sliding and occasionally snapped sideways in faster corners, they did have good traction for braking and accelerating. 5/10
    Their best performance was in the clay. 7/10
    Grip on the steep gravel climb was lacking. 5.5/10
    The Wranglers had good flotation on sand but not a lot of bite. 6.5/10


    MANUFACTURER: PIRELLI
    MADE IN BRAZIL
    PATTERN NAME: SCORPION A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $272

    COMMENT
    The Scorpions put on a good show in the bitumen slalom. They were responsive and predictable. They held their line and went where you told them. 10/10

    Gravel roads posed no problem for the Pirellis. Good grip at both ends of the HiLux meant corners could be taken at higher speeds than with many other brands. Even when you did get the Scorpions sideways, they responded by regaining grip quickly. 9.5/10
    They drove through the clay pit easily and never showed signs of getting stuck. 8.5/10
    They made the gravel hill climb look easy, with very little wheelspin. 9/10
    The Pirelli’s worst performance was on the sand. By that, I mean it didn’t score 10 from 10. The sidewalls didn’t belly out as well as some others, but it still floated on the sand and had just enough bite to accelerate up the sand dune. They weren’t the best of the bunch in sand, but they were still pretty good. 8/10
    After the test, the tread showed minor signs of cut and chipping damage.


    So how did they stack up and who came out on top? While no A/T available can hold a candle to a muddie in the mud or a highway-terrain on the highway, several of the A/Ts we tested will do most things pretty well, eliminating the need for owning two sets of tyres. Each tyre’s performance in each test section is scored out of 10 and then given an overall average out of 10. This way you can see the tyre that did best overall and scan the chart to see which tyres scored best in the sections that interest you.
    Some tyres that were strong in most areas only needed to perform poorly in a couple of tests to drop down the overall list. For this reason, I have added one chart showing each tyre’s off-road performance separately from each tyre’s overall performance, which paints a different picture. I won’t beat around the bush. The Pirelli Scorpion was the best A/T by a country mile. It was just as good off-road as it was on it and excelled everywhere. While it didn’t win every section, to our surprise, it came bloody close. The BFGs and Pirellis performed well in the tougher conditions, but the Cooper showed the most bite, just edging out the Pirelli in the off-road section of the test.






    Gripping Stuff
    Words by Glenn Wright, photography by Robb Cox and studio photography by Karl Dietrich
    Glenn Wright mixes hi-tech gadgetry with years of motorsport testing experience to bring you the latest no-bull 4WD Action tyre comparo. Over four gruelling days, all 14 major players in the A/T market went tread to tread on every surface down-under. Are they really the jack-of-all-trades, or can A/Ts be the master of some? Don’t even try to anticipate the results
    WHO MADE IT HAPPEN?
    These results don’t appear by magic. Over the three months it took to organise this test, I spent many hours on the end of the phone explaining that I wanted to do a tyre test in more detail than any ever attempted in the 4WD industry. Some people said it couldn’t be done, but those whose names appear in this story jumped at the chance to be involved.
    When I needed wheels, the first name that came to mind was ROH. Testing the tyres on each road surface one after another was important. With 56 tyres to be tested, 56 wheels were needed to mount them all to before we left Sydney.
    ROH Wheels supplied us with pallet loads of its latest RTX alloys that transformed the mild-looking HiLux into a real head-turner.
    Without the hassle of mounting and demounting tyres during the test, I could get through all the bitumen testing, for example, in one day.
    This was necessary to ensure the road conditions were the same for every tyre and, more importantly, kept my impression of the preceding tyres fresh in my mind so as to make accurate comparisons between their performances.
    Thanks to Sam at Overkill Engineering for his handy air jack and to Kangaroo Creek Imports for supplying these handy rattle guns. They do a great job in getting wheels off quickly and are easy to carry on long trips.
    What can I say about the HiLux that the pictures don’t? It stood up to a week of punishment, including merciless braking tests and countless dousing in mud. The Toyota handled the high-speed gravel testing with ease, and its predictable handling and sharp steering allowed me to tell how each tyre went in those sections.
    The 4L petrol goes like a scalded cat, and it is the first 4WD I have ever emerged from after a week of driving without a hint of back pain. In hindsight, I couldn’t have chosen a more appropriate vehicle to test all 14 sets of tyres on.
    We had the perfect place to test the tyres, the vehicle to test them on and wheels to mount them to. I now needed someone to fit and balance all 56 tyres and get them up to the test ground.
    Enter Beaurepaires. From the senior management down, Beaurepaires staff share our love of off-roading.

    Beaurepaires was my first choice because of its huge network of country branches and bush support. It knows what we 4WDers put our tyres through and can offer an additional four-year Road Hazard Warranty. This covers you for all unrepairable tyre damage for four years.
    It was keen to be heavily involved in the logistical side and supplied three experienced tyre fitters to whip tyres on and off the HiLux all week. (I said it was ‘kind’ of a holiday, didn’t I, guys?)
    Surrounded by such professionals, I could just concentrate on evaluating the tyres, which allowed me to complete the test without knowing which tyres were on the HiLux until the very end.

    This approach eliminated any of my preconceptions regarding the brands, and after the test my notes were married up with a list of the tyres in the order in which they were tested.
    TERMINOLOGY
    A/T: Stands for all-terrain and refers to a 4WD tyre that can be used on most surfaces.
    M/T: Stands for mud-terrain tyre or ‘muddie’ for use in muddy conditions.
    H/T: Denotes a highway-terrain tyre designed for on-road use.

    TYRE PATTERN: Refers to the tread pattern and is unique to each variant within a certain brand of tyre (For example, Scorpion, Dueler 694 and so on).
    SPEED RATING: In this test, the speed ratings range from N to T. This specifies the maximum speed that you can travel at with this tyre inflated to its maximum labelled pressure. N=140km/h, P=150km/h, Q=160km/h, R=170km/h, S=180km/h, T=180km/h.
    LOAD RATING/INDEX: The load index represents a figure in kilograms being the maximum weight that tyre can carry at its maximum recommended inflation pressure.


    LET THE TESTING BEGIN
    Do you salivate over sand driving? Drooling over dirt? Maybe mud’s on your menu?
    Whatever your taste in terrain, here’s the recipe for the ultimate A/T tyre test I prepared earlier.

    Preparation time: we allowed three months to source all ingredients.
    Grab four of the latest A/T tyres from each of the 14 biggest tyre companies on the planet. Wrap them around 56 new ROH alloy wheels. Stick them under a new HiLux Ute and throw in equal parts sand, asphalt, gravel and wet clay.
    Shred tyres across every road surface, turning often, until the tread becomes hot and sticky. Pierce each tyre under controlled conditions with a steel plunger to measure its puncture resistance, and record the noise it makes when rotated on the bitumen at 80km/h.
    Hand-pick the finest team of tyre fitters from Beaurepaires and throw them into the mix along with all the gear you’d need to set up a tyre shop in the middle of nowhere.

    Whet a final-year mechanical engineering student’s appetite with all the latest data-logging equipment he can sink his teeth into, and you’ve literally got yourself the most in-depth A/T tyre comparo ever attempted in 4WDing history.
    I invite you to gorge yourself on the smorgasbord of information that follows. After digesting the results, you’ll be hungry to get out there and purchase the A/T tyre that’s best for you.
    We 4WDers are a hard bunch to please when it comes to tyres. We want a 4WD tyre that is well behaved on the black stuff, right at home on the sand and is happier than a pig in the slop. (Unlike muddies or highway tyres, an A/T tyre doesn’t have the luxury of specialising on any one surface.) Oh, and can they do it quietly, not get punctures and last forever?
    Okay, we might be asking a bit much, but huge demand for the versatile A/T has seen every major rubber company invest heaps of time and money to come up with a compromise between the M/T and the H/T. Let me explain.

    A/T TYRE CONSTRUCTION

    Don’t assume too much from looking at the tread. The secret to an A/T’s performance lies deep beneath its tread pattern.
    The unique tread designs play a big role in each tyre’s performance, and the more open patterns usually fare better in the mud and worse on the bitumen, but a quick look at how tyres are made sheds more light on what’s really going on.
    Every tyre on the test started life as white rubber sap that was collected from rubber trees or was partly synthetically produced.

    Each manufacturer has a different way of transforming that raw product into a tyre it hopes will outperform its competitors in as many conditions as possible. Due to the multitude of ways engineers can achieve this, every brand of A/T tyre varies significantly in its construction.
    Each tyre’s overall construction uses a different combination of steel, nylon and or polyester belts encased in rubber of varying compounds. This construction is critical in providing strength and allowing the tread to get maximum purchase on the ground.

    We’ve all seen how useless an H/T is in mud and vice versa, so you can appreciate how hard it is to reach a compromise in construction that allows an A/T to cope with so many different surfaces. As a result, some tyre manufacturers sacrifice one aspect of off-road performance in return for better performance in another.
    TEST METHOD
    What made you choose your current A/Ts? Brand loyalty from the past, have you been seduced by convincing ad campaigns or did some bloke at the bar give you the good oil on what tyre to settle on?
    Plenty of us have been fortunate enough to try out many different brands over the years, but it’s difficult to draw a comparison between them unless you’re using the same vehicle on the same roads, testing the tyres in quick succession.

    Hopefully the 12 years I spent engineering race cars and waving spanners for Ralliart while Tommi Makinen won his four World Rally Championships have counted for something. The test procedures followed here are a combination of those used by tyre manufacturers testing their own products and those used in top-level motorsport to determine the most competitive tyre to use.
    Subjective testing is necessary to be able to put into words how each tyre felt through the seat of my pants and the steering wheel. But nothing beats the numerical feedback recorded by the data logger.
    The HiLux resembled a coma patient with all the data loggers and cables hanging out of it, but the data we gathered from them validated the results and confirmed my opinions on each tyre.

    Having said that, a bunch of numbers means nothing unless you know how to interpret them. Drew is graduating from Sydney Uni as we speak and has been rallying with me for years. He is familiar with vehicle testing and took charge of our hi-tech accessories while ensuring all testing was consistent.
    We chose the most commonly sold A/T tyre size in Australia, the 265/75R16. In order to compare apples with apples, all 265/75R16s (except the Silverstone, which only offers a 275/70R16 LT) were happily supplied by the manufacturers in light-truck (LT) construction (as opposed to passenger-vehicle construction, which is not as strong).

    Several manufacturers had more than one type of A/T tyre, so I requested they send the most suitable latest release.
    With all the tyres on our doorstep and everything taking shape, I needed to find the perfect venue. The testing grounds had to reflect every possible condition that A/Ts would be subjected to in real life.
    After much searching, we found a private property that had the lot - bitumen roads, gravel roads, both well formed and un-kept, and a wide, open gravel area that we graded constantly to maintain a level playing field.

    All these areas were a stone’s throw from a flooded clay boghole, which led up to a 30 degree inclined gravel hill designed to stop 4WDs from making it to the top.
    In testing these tyres, I wanted to provide answers to all the questions buyers ask about all-terrains. These include noise, performance in sand, mud, gravel, bitumen and puncture resistance.
    TYRE NOISE
    Generally, A/Ts are quieter on-road than muddies, but it’s too late once you’ve forked out for a set of A/Ts only to realise that the tyre noise drives you nuts. To bring out the worst in each tyre, a section of coarse bitumen was chosen on which to perform a coast-down noise test.
    ‘Pattern’ noise caused by the tread is most noticeable at higher speeds, so at 80km/h I depressed the clutch to eliminate driveline and engine noise. We used a sound meter to record what you would hear from inside the vehicle over a 10sec period.
    To give some relevance to the results, the standard OE tyres on the HiLux recorded 59.1dB under the same conditions. For every 3dB increase, you approximately double the noise volume.
    MANUFACTURER: MICKEY THOMPSON
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: FC2
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: N
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $275

    COMMENT
    MICKEY THOMPSON FC2
    The FC2 turned in well on the gravel. It responded pretty well to steering changes and was predictable. 7/10

    On the bitumen slalom, things changed; the steering was unresponsive and vague. The chunky tread blocks that excelled in the mud squirmed around under the load. Not the worst tyre on the blacktop but not the pick either. 6/10
    The FC2 was like a pig, in that it loved the mud. This was the second-best tyre in the sloppy clay and responded to the throttle, making light work of the slippery conditions. 9.5/10
    The chunky blocks in the tread bit into the gravel incline and walked up it with ease. 8.5/10
    On sand, the FC2s found it hard to get going from rest. Once moving, they had good bite and gained momentum quickly. 6.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed no signs of chipping and only minor cutting.

    MANUFACTURER: MICHELIN
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: LTX A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: C 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $332

    COMMENT
    The Michelin carried higher speeds than most through the bitumen slalom and remained composed. It offered great response to turn-in and gave a great feel for what was happening. 9.5/10

    On the gravel, the Michelin had plenty of grip, even giving off a loud whining noise as it bit into the gravel circle. It was hard to make them wheelspin, and they carried higher speeds around the circle than any other tyre.
    As far as balance was concerned, they understeered on turn-in but were very difficult to make oversteer. Their best feature was sideways grip on gravel, and no other tyre could repeat their performance. 10/10

    They handled the clay pit well, biting in and responding to the accelerator. 8/10
    The gravel incline saw the clogged-up Michelins struggle for grip, not making much of an impression on the hill. 6
    Really good bulge in the sidewalls at 20psi allowed them to sit on top of the sand. They lacked a little bite to gain momentum quickly. 9/10

    MANUFACTURER: YOKOHAMA MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: GEOLANDER G011
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $239

    COMMENT
    While the G011s’ response to turn-in wasn’t as sharp as I had expected, on the bitumen slalom they were predictable, letting you know their intentions. They were slow to react to a change in direction, as the tread blocks rolled under the tyre during hard cornering. 7.5/10

    They lacked grip on the gravel section relative to the better gravel tyres, and they understeered readily. 6.5/10
    I was pleasantly surprised by their traction in the clay pit. They dug in and pulled the HiLux through easily. They were only a whisker less capable than the Cooper and BFG, and were one of the best options for a good mud tyre that’s quiet on-road. 8.5/10
    On the gravel hill, the Yokies spun too easily and gave up the fight. 6.5/10
    The Geolanders were just reasonable on sand. They didn’t float as well as some others and made it hard to get going from a standing start. Reasonable bite allowed them to gain momentum up the dune. 6/10
    They showed very minor signs of tread chipping after the test.
    MANUFACTURER: SILVERSTONE
    MADE IN MALAYSIA
    PATTERN NAME: AT-117-SPECIAL
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 225mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: 114
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $198 inc fitting

    COMMENT
    This tyre was not a good performer on the slalom. It was vague and unresponsive on turn-in and didn’t change direction well. 6.5/10

    The Silverstone had good general grip in the gravel and was reluctant to hang the tail out because it was very prone to understeering. 7/10
    The Silverstone, which shares a similar tread pattern to the BFG, was good in the clay. 8/10
    The Silverstone climbed a long way up the hill but had its fair share of wheelspin in getting up. 8/10
    For a tyre that resembles the BFG in many ways, the Silverstone was nowhere near as good on sand. It lacked flotation and bite. 6.5/10
    No cutting or chipping was noticed on the tread. They are a bit average on bitumen but will keep you moving forwards on the slippery stuff.
    MANUFACTURER: BRIDGESTONE
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: DUELER D694
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $267

    COMMENT
    This tyre performed well on tarmac. It was a little slow to respond to steering, but once the tread blocks had rolled under the tyre a little, it grips and changes direction well. It carried a higher speed through the slalom than many and was predictable. They just lacked the direct steering response of the top three. 8.5/10

    The Bridgestone fought well for grip on the gravel. The HiLux was better balanced on the Duelers than most and gave the best feedback as to when you had overstepped the mark. They had plenty of grip in a straight line and were one of the best for stopping on gravel. They provided good response to steering but just didn’t have the outright grip of the leaders. 8.5/10
    The Dueler put up a good fight in the clay pit. 7.5/10
    They were okay on the hill but had to work pretty hard to get up with lots of wheelspin. 7/10
    The 694 bellied out well and showed great flotation on sand. They displayed very impressive bite, and response to throttle saw them climb the dune easily. 9.5/10
    No cutting or chipping was noticed on the tread.
    MANUFACTURER: SUMITOMO
    PATTERN NAME: SL850 SERENGETI RADIAL A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    MADE IN JAPAN
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $225

    COMMENT
    We had slight difficulty in mounting some of the Sumitomo A/Ts on the wheels due to what appeared to be extra-tight clearances in the bead diameters. While they weren’t as sharp in the steering department as the top few on-road, they weren’t too bad. 7/10

    In the sloppy clay, the Sumitomos bit in well with no hint of getting bogged. 7.5/10
    Lateral grip exceeded my expectations on gravel, allowing a bit of understeer, while the rear end never stepped out. 8/10
    The gravel hill didn’t suit the Serengetis, which struggled for grip almost from the word go. 6/10
    The Serengetis aren’t a good sand tyre. I needed low-range to get moving. Poor flotation made them struggle, and I had to keep the revs and momentum up to keep moving. 4/10
    Very minor cutting was noticed in the tread after testing.
    MANUFACTURER: COOPER
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: DISCOVERER ST-C
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 220mm
    SPEED RATING: N
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $308

    COMMENT
    The Coopers were the most off-road-oriented tyres in the field. As a result, they aren’t well suited to the blacktop. On the bitumen slalom, the chunky tread blocks squirmed around, making the steering feel vague. The Coopers slid at all four corners of the HiLux as I tried to maintain a similar speed through the slalom to the better bitumen brands. 6/10

    On the gravel circle, the Coopers broke into understeer. They offered good fore/aft traction on gravel roads, were good for braking and were quite predictable, recovering well from high-speed slides. They had a tendency to tramline on long, straight stretches. On hard-packed gravel, the Cooper’s aggressive tread feels harder than the others and doesn’t get the chance to bite in. It therefore doesn’t grip as well on this surface as some of the less aggressive softer-compound tyres but performs well considering. 7.5/10
    The Coopers were the best tyres in the sloppy clay. Their ability to bite in and grab handfuls of the stuff as they churned their way across was second to none, even though the Mickey Thompsons weren’t far behind. 10/10
    The steep gravel hill also suited the Coopers. Once again they outperformed the rest of the field here as they bit into the slightly chopped-up gravel and climbed to the top. Even after momentary losses of grip, the Coopers were quick to regain traction and keep climbing. 10/10
    The ST-Cs’ sidewalls bellied out well at 20psi and provided good flotation on the sand. Good bite helped them gain momentum quickly. 8/10
    The ST-Cs are the new cut and chip-resistant compound, but the tread still showed signs of cutting and chipping after four days of abuse.
    MANUFACTURER: BF GOODRICH
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: ALL-TERRAIN T/A KO
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 220mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 120
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 3 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 3 polyester
    PRICE: $269

    COMMENT
    There was too much tread movement when cornering hard on the bitumen slalom. This resulted in slow and vague steering response. The lack of general lateral grip saw the rear tyres slide sideways, leaving impressive :blackies’ on the road that resembled those on a :slippery when wet’ sign. 6.5/10

    In a similar way on gravel, the BFGs showed good bite but switched between understeer and letting go at the rear at moderate speeds. Like the Coopers, the BFGs tramlined on the same long gravel straight. Overall good general gravel bite. 7.5/10
    The BFGs seemed at home in the clay pit. They were only a whisker less impressive than the Coopers and responded instantly to more throttle by ploughing through the slippery quagmire. 9/10
    On the climb up the gravel incline, the BFGs bit in and travelled a good distance up, but then they just stopped biting and spun. 8.5/10
    At 20psi, the sidewalls bulged out well. They had a good combination of flotation and bite on the sand. They steered out of existing ruts well and responded to acceleration. 8.5/10
    The tread showed signs of cutting after the test.
    MANUFACTURER: SIMEX
    MADE IN MALAYSIA
    PATTERN NAME: CENTIPEDE AT300i
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 205mm
    SPEED RATING: T
    LOAD RATING: 116
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $195

    COMMENT
    The Centipede AT300is were good on the gravel. They provided good front-end grip for steering and let out a howl when spinning as they fought and gripped on the dirt. They lacked a little braking and straight-line traction but showed good sideways grip on the gravel circle. 8.5/10

    On bitumen, they showed a good response to steering and changed direction well. 7/10
    The Simexes did a good job in the clay boghole, showing good bite. 7.5/10
    When their turn came to scale the gravel hill, they gave surprisingly good traction. 8 The sidewalls seemed to belly out well, but the Simex lacked flotation and bite on sand. 5.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed very minor signs of cutting.
    MANUFACTURER: TOYO
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: OPEN COUNTRY A/T (OPAT)
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 1 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $285

    COMMENT
    The OPATs provided good grip on bitumen. They responded quickly to changes in direction and went where I pointed them. 7.5/10

    On gravel, they lacked straight-line traction but gave good sideways grip. 6.5/10
    Their performance in clay was respectable. 6.5/10
    When climbing the steep hill, the Toyos were unspectacular but got on with the job. 7/10
    At 20psi, they showed very little sidewall bulge. They sat low in the sand and lacked grip, causing them to wheelspin easily and dig in. 5/10
    After testing, the tread showed no signs of cutting or chipping.
    MANUFACTURER: KUMHO
    MADE IN KOREA
    PATTERN NAME: ROAD VENTURE KL 41 (8-ply rating)
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: S
    LOAD RATING: D 119
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $270

    Comments
    The Kumho’s soft tread blocks squirmed around on the bitumen and left some decent skid-marks to show the way through the slalom. Despite this, they turned in and gripped well. 7/10
    On gravel roads, the Kumhos bit into the surface, and the HiLux went where you pointed it. It showed no signs of tramlining. 8/10
    The Venture was very capable in the clay, where it hardly struggled for traction. 8/10
    Good bite on the steep gravel hill and their never-say-die attitude saw them slip then regain traction and climb some more. 8/10
    The Kumhos were the last to get a run on the sand. Their superior flotation and excellent traction shocked me. They didn’t quite have the bite of the Coopers, but they were by far the best overall. They climbed the dune easily with no run-up and were the only tyres to exit the beach in second-gear high-range. 10/10
    MANUFACTURER: DUNLOP
    MADE IN JAPAN
    PATTERN NAME: GRANDTREK AT2
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: Q
    LOAD RATING: C 112
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $284

    Comments
    The Dunlop was very predictable and put in a good fight on the gravel surface. It made a high-pitched hum as it gripped the constant-radius turn and showed early signs of wear on the outer shoulder. 8.5/10

    As soon as you turned the steering wheel on bitumen, the Dunlops responded. They carried good speed through the slalom and felt very stable. 9/10
    Wet clay didn’t suit the Dunlops much. 5.5/10
    They climbed the steep hill well but couldn’t do quite as well as the Kumhos. 7/10

    The Dunlops floated over the sand beautifully. Slightly less bite than the top few but still good overall. 9.5/10
    After the test, the tread showed no signs of cutting or chipping damage.
    MANUFACTURER: GOODYEAR
    MADE IN USA
    PATTERN NAME: WRANGLER
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 210mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 aramid (Kevlar), 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE:

    COMMENT
    If four-wheel slides are your thing, then the Goodyears will suit your needs on the blacktop. They cried out for grip but couldn’t find any. At least they lost traction gradually and didn’t try to surprise with a sudden loss of control. 5.5/10

    The Goodyears weren’t all bad on the gravel. While they offered no grip to steer into corners, were slow to recover from sliding and occasionally snapped sideways in faster corners, they did have good traction for braking and accelerating. 5/10
    Their best performance was in the clay. 7/10
    Grip on the steep gravel climb was lacking. 5.5/10
    The Wranglers had good flotation on sand but not a lot of bite. 6.5/10
    MANUFACTURER: PIRELLI
    MADE IN BRAZIL
    PATTERN NAME: SCORPION A/T
    ACTUAL TREAD WIDTH: 200mm
    SPEED RATING: R
    LOAD RATING: E 123
    CONSTRUCTION: Sidewall plies - 2 polyester, Tread plies - 2 nylon, 2 steel, 2 polyester
    PRICE: $272

    COMMENT
    The Scorpions put on a good show in the bitumen slalom. They were responsive and predictable. They held their line and went where you told them. 10/10

    Gravel roads posed no problem for the Pirellis. Good grip at both ends of the HiLux meant corners could be taken at higher speeds than with many other brands. Even when you did get the Scorpions sideways, they responded by regaining grip quickly. 9.5/10
    They drove through the clay pit easily and never showed signs of getting stuck. 8.5/10
    They made the gravel hill climb look easy, with very little wheelspin. 9/10
    The Pirelli’s worst performance was on the sand. By that, I mean it didn’t score 10 from 10. The sidewalls didn’t belly out as well as some others, but it still floated on the sand and had just enough bite to accelerate up the sand dune. They weren’t the best of the bunch in sand, but they were still pretty good. 8/10
    After the test, the tread showed minor signs of cut and chipping damage.
    So how did they stack up and who came out on top? While no A/T available can hold a candle to a muddie in the mud or a highway-terrain on the highway, several of the A/Ts we tested will do most things pretty well, eliminating the need for owning two sets of tyres. Each tyre’s performance in each test section is scored out of 10 and then given an overall average out of 10. This way you can see the tyre that did best overall and scan the chart to see which tyres scored best in the sections that interest you.
    Some tyres that were strong in most areas only needed to perform poorly in a couple of tests to drop down the overall list. For this reason, I have added one chart showing each tyre’s off-road performance separately from each tyre’s overall performance, which paints a different picture. I won’t beat around the bush. The Pirelli Scorpion was the best A/T by a country mile. It was just as good off-road as it was on it and excelled everywhere. While it didn’t win every section, to our surprise, it came bloody close. The BFGs and Pirellis performed well in the tougher conditions, but the Cooper showed the most bite, just edging out the Pirelli in the off-road section of the test.
    This LANDY has NO Oil Leak yet
    !!! !!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Durbanville ,Cape town
    Age
    67
    Posts
    497
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    Here is the matrix

    [IMG]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/ROMAN%7E1.EXA/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg[/IMG]
    Attached Files Attached Files
    This LANDY has NO Oil Leak yet
    !!! !!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lichtenburg
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,033
    Thanked: 12

    Default

    Very interesting read!

    Almal kry die voorreg om onnosel te wees, net jammer party maak misbruik daarvan

  4. #4
    Kgalagadi Guest

    Default

    I just bought a 2004 Discovery Td5 A/T. Anyone with tyre experiences re the Pirelli's?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    De Kelders
    Age
    79
    Posts
    4,442
    Thanked: 135

    Default

    I have them on my WJ Jeep. More than happy, very very quiet and fantastic in the wet.
    Just done 70k with them and about ready for replacement.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Durban
    Age
    53
    Posts
    356
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kalahari View Post
    Sorry pics don,t come out
    Now they do.


    MICKEY THOMPSON FC2



    MICHELIN LTX A/T



    YOKOHAMA GEOLANDER G011



    SILVERSTONE AT-117-SPECIAL



    BRIDGESTONE DUELER D694



    SUMITOMO SL850 SERENGETI RADIAL A/T



    COOPER DISCOVERER ST-C




    BF GOODRICH ALL-TERRAIN T/A KO



    SIMEX CENTIPEDE AT300i



    TOYO OPEN COUNTRY A/T (OPAT)



    KUMHO ROAD VENTURE KL 41 (8-ply rating)



    DUNLOP GRANDTREK AT2



    GOODYEAR WRANGLER



    PIRELLI SCORPION A/T





    And the source of the article: http://www.4wdmonthly.com.au/tips_tyres.php

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Patensie
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Maar die toets is in OZ gedoen ! Ek wil graag soorgelyke toets in Afrika sien. Daar is n rede waarom die Ozzies vir die Wallabies skreeu en die Suid- Afrikaners vir die Bokke. Daar is n goeie rede vir ons om sekere voertuie voorkeur te gee an ander nie, en sekere bande in Afrika te gebruik en nie ander nie. Afrika is nie vir sussies nie . Geldigheid en betroubaarheid

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanked: 110

    Default Local vs other

    I agree totally about tyres for African conditions. If one looks at the Goodyear in these tests, it comes last. This tyre is significantly different to the AT/SA just launched in RSA. The AT/SA has different compounds to handle the ruff road conditions in Africa as well as a stepped sidewall lug for rut traction. Local tests have shown significant improvements over the International specification in our conditions.

    The methodology of the tests conducted however cannot be faulted. It would be interesting if some forum guys got together at say Gerotrek to conduct such a local test and see the results.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanked: 110

    Default Picture of AT/SA sidewall

    Here is a picture of the lug design which is not hugely agressive to create noise, but provides the desired results.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	WRG_ATSA_14.jpg 
Views:	8483 
Size:	88.1 KB 
ID:	33428  

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Patensie
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Die ouens wat nie muds in hulle band grootte kan kry nie

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    East London
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,076
    Thanked: 210

    Default

    How about the Firestone ATX's anyone to comment on these please?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pretoria North, Patryshoek
    Age
    63
    Posts
    16,440
    Thanked: 3233

    Default

    Yes I will. Steer very clear. Had them on my 2700i and nearly killed me. 2 of them failed on me. The tread, including the steel belt, ripped loose from the sidewall. All the way around. So badly that the tread was lying in the tarmac. I now have BFG muds on and I treat them exacly the same way and they work like a bomd. The ATX tyres also take about 5,000km to run in. In that term they are like driving on slime. All over the road. Never again.
    LC 78 Troopie 1HD-FTE
    +27 zero eight 2 four 95 9252

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Centurion
    Age
    46
    Posts
    119
    Thanked: 10

    Default

    Dunno about the Firestone ATX's but I bought the AT's since they scored best on tirerack. Very pleased with them thus far. Much less road noise than my previous Goodyears. Pity they did not include the Firestones in the review.
    Last edited by nomie2; 2009/04/28 at 08:17 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Age
    53
    Posts
    11,400
    Thanked: 287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayefe View Post
    How about the Firestone ATX's anyone to comment on these please?
    I was very happy with the ATX's that were fitted to my Colt. Did about 35000km before I sold the bakkie and they were almost like new. While I did quite a few trails I'm not sure however, that they would take the beating my BFG's AT's have taken.

    For a general purpose tyre where you're not doing a great deal of offroading I think they're excellent value for money.
    Carpe Diem Scrotum
    Give a man a beer, waste an hour. Teach a man to brew, and waste a lifetime!

  15. #15
    Beans Guest

    Default

    There is nothing wrong with ATX for that budget tyres. Remember different tyres perform differently on different vehicles. EG on my hilux old shape i had BFG,s on for a week and took them off, now some guys swear by them, maybe i should learn to drive? What i dont understand is that most want to fit MUD tyres and yet only use there vehicle offroad for say 10% of the time yet dont think of the safety issue regarding speed and increased side wall height

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bloemfontein
    Age
    60
    Posts
    2,285
    Thanked: 864

    Default

    Australian conditions is very similar to ours, so I think that is no issue.

    I have Pirelli ATR on my Mazda 4x4 and it by far the most superior AT tyres I've ever had. What I like most of them, that they do perform very well on road, where lives is at stake!I hear from others that punctures is a problem, but I never had a problem. I have Brigestones on my Pajero. Lost a tyre on a normal gravel road in Nam, they are noisy and the Pirelli's is defnitely on the shopping list, the next round.

    O'key guys, I still think that BFG will give you less flats (contrary to the research), but oh that bad grip on tar in the wet!!!

    Bostoe

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Patensie
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Bostoe van watter BFG bande praat jy as jy se nat paaie die AT of die MUDS ?

  18. #18
    Majida Guest

    Default

    What about the general grabber at2? I am thinking of putting them on my Touareg TDI V6?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Modderfontein
    Age
    51
    Posts
    5
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Very interesting, but as mentioned - this is a test done in Oz. And we do have alternatives here, even those made for local conditions.

    When you stack up the results of the test above - against the results of the Poll on this forum - as to what tyres are used, then you have to ask the question - WHY so biased to the BFG's?

    On the tests done in Oz, the Pirelli's win the A/T on paper. Sure this is A/T, and if you're doing serious offroading, a muddy will do the job.

    Also, and for obvious reasons, the tests do not include longevity of the tyre, which OF COURSE is an equally important factor!

    These results (both the test done in Oz, as well the feedback on the forum Polls) - are of specific interest to me. I have to replace tyres on BOTH my Toyota's within next few weeks;

    Prado = 265/65/17 (used 90% road use - mostly towing)
    Rav4 = 236/60/16 (used 100% road use)

    So bearing that in mind, I should be fitting the Pirelli's? Yes?
    Looking for some advice! Pirelli does both these sizes as standard.

    Just to throw some MORE confusion to my query, my PERSONAL bias is to Michelin LTX - which had on Hilux, and they were INCREDIBLE!!

    sigh - its enough to make a monkey bite it's mother
    Mark Trollope (Empty)
    04 Toyota Prado 4,0 VX
    05 Toyota Rav4 2,0
    05 Jurgens Exclusive HM
    07 Yamaha Fazer 600

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pretoria
    Age
    57
    Posts
    31
    Thanked: 3

    Default

    I fitted the BRIDGESTONE DUELER D694 to my S/Cab 2.5d Ford and set off to the Namib desert (5 days in the dunes). It transformed the bakkie and was an absolute fantastic tyre in the sand. Not a chip or puncture all the way there and back - through the Kalahari G/Park etc. – 7500km.
    I would love to say that it was due to my exceptional driving skills, but have to concede that the tyres had to play a major roll in the ford’s ability to clear seeming impossible mountains of sand, I did opt for a 265 rather than the standard 245 size.
    They had a slight gain in circumference, making the over-read on the Speedo closer to actual speed measured against the GPS.
    Noise levels were no more than the standard tyres they replaced, then again it is not the quietest bakkie to start with so humming is most likely drummed out if it was there.
    It was very heavily loaded with 2 vehicles fuel and water for the trip and fitted with a canvas and steel canopy carrying most of the camping gear for 2 families.

    I now own n Touareg, and are seriously considering the same tyre, I am not interested in mug driving, Will avoid mud at all cost – my motto. The B/Stones were perfect on the Bakkie, they looked good and have good sidewall protection – not so sure that they will look so lekker on the Touareg. Maybe the Pirelli – but with the West Coast (Namibia/Richtersveld) being my main focus, not sure about the “low” sand rating – and the noise level, what’s up with that!!

    The Touareg standard tyre is a 235/65/17, can I go to a 255/65/17 without an issue. Like a bigger and wider tyre.
    Last edited by Wawlia; 2009/06/01 at 04:08 PM.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Snot plugs
    By Stefan in forum Tyre chat
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 2021/09/15, 10:13 AM
  2. Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
    By 4x4 in forum Tyre chat
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 2019/01/02, 01:30 PM
  3. Why bigger tyres?
    By SimonB in forum Tyre chat
    Replies: 134
    Last Post: 2010/10/05, 01:22 PM
  4. tyre pressure - coast vs. inland
    By Apocalypse in forum Tyre chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2010/02/12, 03:03 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2010/01/10, 10:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •